1. Gravity’s Rainbow by Thomas Pynchon

2. Middlemarch by George Eliot

3. On the Road by Jack Kerouac

4. The Savage Detectives by Roberto Bolaño

5. Americanah by Chimamanda Ngozi Adichie

6. Infinite Jest and The Pale King by David Foster Wallace

7. Final Harvest by Emily Dickinson

8 Aunt Dan and Lemon by Wallace Shawn

9. The White Album by Joan Didion

10. Ficciones by Jorge Luis Borges

11. The Palm at the End of the Mind by Wallace Stevens

12. Fiskadoro by Denis Johnson

13. The Keep by Jennifer Egan

14. Inherent Vice by Thomas Pynchon

15. IQ84 and Norwegian Wood by Haruki Murakami

16. The Brief Wondrous Life of Oscar Wao by Junot Diaz

17. Murcian Hymns by Geoffrey Hill

18. Post Office by Charles Bukowski

19. Ariel: Poems by Sylvia Plath

20. Angels in America by Tony Kushner

21. Ulysses and Finnegan’s Wake by James Joyce

22. Gulliver’s Travels by Jonathan Swift

23. The Big Sleep and The Long Goodbye by Raymond Chandler

24. Dispatches by Michael Herr

25. Between the Acts by Virginia Woolf

26. Selected Poems and Collected Poems by W.H. Auden

27. Collected Poems by Philip Larkin

28. Europe Central and The Rainbow Stories by William T. Vollmann

29. The Road and Blood Meridian by Cormac McCarthy

30. The Sheltering Sky by Paul Bowles

A supporter came by yesterday and left a donation of hundreds of books in excellent condition, every one of them the kind we don’t sell. Ludlum, Patterson, Clancy, Coben, DeMille, Cussler, Forsythe, Childs… it’s all here: every suspense paperback of the last ten years plus some, sitting out front, for free.

Every now and then the novels of Australian novelist Patrick White show up, and there they sit still, unbought. White won the Nobel in 1974, spurring reprints of his entire oeuvre, its subjects (Empire, Victorians, Australia, passion) ideal for cover art that would disguise his work as historical romance. Voss, published in 1957, surely blew the minds of readers expecting something steamy and easy. Most strikingly, it resembles and prefigures the brutal, Transcendental works of Cormac McCarthy. I’d go so far as to make the case for White as the Big Cormac Attack’s chief antecedent: a dip into the fierce and startling work of this writer puts the lie to the timeworn Faulkner/McCarthy comparison. Voss is every bit the equal of those American historical 80s-straddling monsters Beloved and Blood Meridian, and its long neglect should come to an end.

I think no other book has impressed me as deeply as McCarthy’s The Road (2006). Its hard to find readers of the novel who didn’t pick it up in the afternoon or evening only to read the last page sometime in the late hours before dawn. It is in that very small company of novels that hold the reader hostage, body and soul. Is it horror, science fiction, prophecy, or as one friend tells me, a love story about a boy and his father? Certainly no other book contains as many superlative passages: scariest scene in any book or film? Check. Bleakest futuristic vision? Yep. Best final paragraph? Easily. No campaign to care for the Earth will ever come on as strong, not least because the writer knows our human nature. There are lights in the ashes, but dim. We are fucked.

One book that would certainly make the shortlist of fever dreams a few citations below McCarthy’s apocalyptic opus would be Marilynne Robinson’s Housekeeping (1980), a painstaking, dark procession from isolated childhood to adult madness so resonant in its evocation of the Pacific Northwest landscape it alone made one writer friend of mine move to Seattle from the East twenty years ago, and stay. Robinson broke fifteen years of silence after this book with a pair of cloistered, clerical novels that would be better appreciated in their own right had it not been for the surgical devastation wrought by her first book.

Another literary novel in genre garb is Robert Stone’s A Flag For Sunrise (1982). This book was everywhere thirty years ago: a breathtakingly real spy story set in a barely fictionalized Guatemala and Nicaragua shortly before their bloody civil wars. The strongest impression this novel leaves is an undeniable and unsettling verisimilitude – one thinks Stone must have known these characters, and plenty of them are bad people of the kind whose acquaintance can itself be deadly. The tautness of the narrative as it switches back and forth between three main characters’ destinies – yes, I’ll say it - undermines the deeper quality of the book’s language and surprise that has nothing to do with plot, a bubbling spring of authentic, shocking voices, references and delicate contexts Stone seems to pull in from a world one can’t help but think he knows too well. When you see that part of the novel was published in magazine form in 1977, two years before the success of the Sandinistas, it seems uncannily prophetic, a transmogrified, secret history. I read it first in my early 20s, a period of literary omnivorousness I’ve only approached recently in quantity and never in indiscriminate scope, and I’m afraid I forgot or never apprehended the book’s deeper channels, instead remembering its ‘behind the headlines’ aura and rush of suspense and filed Stone away as a kind of slacker LeCarre (whose work from the 70s is absolutely first-rate IMHO). I only came to this book after recently picking up his stunning debut Dog Soldiers and being urged by the customer who recommended that to pick this up as well. Now I have to read everything else he’s written.

Can fiction be used for evil? Does bad fiction whose intentions are harmless damage our common world? I think first of movies and TV because I haven’t forced myself to read a bad book since trying Ayn Rand at the appropriate age of 15. (I’m not pushing some easy liberal agenda here – I’m no longer American exactly and not following that game - and have started to suspect the most generous interpretation of ‘No justice, no peace’ is ‘We will not rest until we are exterminated’.) I know McCarthy is supposedly a conservative by some broad definition as was Patrick White for that matter: for all I know Stone could be too, and Robinson is a Christian.

No, I’m thinking of wrong art like Christopher Nolan’s The Dark Knight Returns where he puts an American Soviet among interior design from the Terror and in the costumes of Occupy. I’m thinking of Burgess Meredith in that Twilight Zone episode where he plays a banker so immersed in Dickens he won’t relate to real people. To string one argument onto the end of an unanswered question here – it is the literature that doesn’t lie that leads out into the actual world (prescriptive works are plowshares no worker will pick up). Maybe it develops, at its highest levels, in tandem with our need for it, to combat the soporifics of our separate eras that would lull us into unfeeling, waking sleep: the factory, consumerism, Empire, Communism, the security state. It’s not a sideline or an eccentric hobby but a kind of life one can enter and leave at will across the years. It’s waiting for you here.


Want to help us double the quantity of our fiction titles? Go to https://www.indiegogo.com/projects/under-the-volcano-books-texas-book-run/x/6410484 and contribute to the Indiegogo crowdfunding campaign that will make our selection like no other in Mexico, at lower prices than ever. (Link to https://www.facebook.com/TexasBookRun on Facebook.) Our deadline is midnight on Tuesday, April 29th!

‘In Utero’ by Nirvana

April 6th, 2014

Found some time last night after a blue-sky reminder of the Cobain-suicide-anniversary, and being well-pulquedoed sat down – as I have a couple times a year the last two decades – to listen, deeply and alone, to Nirvana’s In Utero.

Holy crap.

Some works last, others date fast as milk. Somehow this record endures – let’s put aside for the moment its dubious validation as farewell to the world, that the record is better because he really meant it – untouched by time, a third rail, bolt-pure electric sensation and feeling. It arcs perfectly, and what to me seems to rise from it more strongly than anything is integrity. What a very disturbed and angry person thought merited being said.

Fools who throw around this ‘loser’ catchphrasery (Sub Pop was kidding, not trying to mint a generational label) or call him a coward, engage in all the positive-thinking claptrap that refuses to see life for some people is unlivable, need to get out – and in – more. The only negative judgment against him really should be that he shot smack with his pregnant wife: I hope my sins amount to less.

But the record. The record. I’d long thought ‘Scentless Apprentice’ (based on Patrick Susskind’s novel Perfume) was the band’s best song, but that honor could equally go to ‘Rape Me’, ‘Frances Farmer Will Have Her Revenge On Seattle’, ‘Dumb’, ‘Radio Friendly Unit-Shifter’ or ‘Tourette’s’.

It does him no good whatsoever that this testament will be heard generations hence. The help it offers is only ours, and exactly what punk was made to offer, that from the trash, the lost and sold and brutalized modern moment, that dignity, humanity, compassion and clarity are possible.

I imagine that in Seattle, more than anywhere last night – where so many drugs are required to get through the long dark spring – that people were gathered here and there, dour-faced or singing in unison in some transport or tribute. I think of one drunk-and-high night around the turn of the century at a poor houseparty, beer-and-pot, where half the gathering collected into the barren, dim living room to stand stunned into silence by the last side of Modest Mouse’s The Lonesome Crowded West. I nearly forgot that house until some years later my business partner at the time bought and renovated it beyond recognition, still oppressive and poor-feeling though, under fresh paint. (I also ended up one night in those years at a high-class affair in the Cobain house, also renovated ugly and past any trace of what happened there.) My ex-partner and his family have moved on since. Our longtime mutual friend, a realtor, arranged the sale, her very last. The night the escrow cleared, she died of a heart attack. Two decades pass and almost nothing is the same. Still, we cling to the verities.



The 80s were a decade about which sweeping generalizations are made which conceal a billion daily realities – I think of Christopher Isherwood visiting Venezuela late in life and remarking that it had been going about its very different business “the whole time”, all the time he’d been alive. But some generalities, being general, can be made. It was a point of huge capital energies being expended in the vacancy of a colossal crisis of faith, when the foundations of old views of the world had been cracked to their very base. New technologies, in what would in retrospect be seen as their infancy, were already changing the rhythms of daily life, the speed of information and capital. It was the best of times, the worst of times.

I’m talking of course about the 1880s, when Samuel Butler completed an autobiographical novel so critical of Victorian pieties that he suppressed it until after his death. It is all ‘tell’ and no ‘show’, with not a single quotation mark in 400 pages. To a contemporary reader, its cultural critique is shooting fish in a barrel. The cruel remnants of an already castrated church go through their tired and hypocritical pantomime, and Butler spends half the book laying the generational groundwork to explain one confused young semi-aristocrat’s journey through the stations of what eventually proves a full life, from cloister to gutter, prison to pundit.

This book somehow remains near the top of the occasional Best English Novels list, but is very little read today, and its easy to see why. As I read it myself, I was drawn on by its barely submerged, subtle wit even as it explained at length dry angels-on-a-pin arguments that were ideological current events in its own time, rendered by our epoch antique. I’m not sure why I feel this book has to be reckoned with, if to embody the irrelevant arguments of a lost time or to see summed up in one novel everything one writer felt must be said but never to the open air so long as he lived (the book was published in 1902).

My copy was one I stumbled on in one of our local used bookstores that carry a plethora of unsalable bestsellers from a generation back in dust and disregard, and a select few any customer would buy. 1919 Modern Library edition, so bound in gorgeous leather with the odd Art Nouveau landscape and muscled neuters holding up letters in the flyleaf. A friend visiting the store last week in a state of inebriation seized on  it and I promised I’d sell it to him when I finished for 100 pesos. (I paid 60. Like I say, what you pay for here is the selection.) I’m not sure I can still recommend it, for him. I’m not sure what to say about this book. Which is often better than knowing what to say.

Last night I was alone for several hours, slightly pulquedo, with the full choice of 20th century media options at my disposal (no computer and minus the stereo because I still have water in my ear from the puente). I spent the first hour reading seven chapters of a beautiful little leatherbound 1919 Modern Library edition of Samuel Butler’s The Way of All Flesh.  The book breaks that MFA workshop rule of show-don’t-tell: it’s all tell, wryly funny and engaging across the centuries, taking its time to deliver all the while giving you the strong sense the wait is worthwhile.

Under the influence of the maguey as I was, though, I felt I was reading a little faster than I’d wish I had later, so I turned to my audio-visual options, choosing out of curiosity a DVD which I have no idea how it entered the house, the 1978 Dunne-Didion-Streisand-Kristofferson second remake of A Star is Born. I can remember when this movie came out – repelled at eleven by its shirtless-and-shaggy poster image – and that’s why I’ll watch pretty much anything from the 70s: I can remember those years, and am consistently astonished at their current remove. It was blank, tacky, used-up modernity then, an Age of Brass, and it is astonishing to now see it antique and shadowy, a color lithograph. Screenplay by Joan Didion (and others)!

The movie is unwatchable. Kristofferson is believable as a washed-up rebel rock star, but his soul-crush on Streisand, in full eye-rolling wacky Jewish grandmother mode, is unintentionally hilarious. I finally had to turn it off at the scene where, at the AIM benefit that might salvage his career, Kris turns the stage over to Babs, who belts out her trademark corny, proto-Celine Dion scales practice that has in our time aged so badly, and the crowd goes wild. The Rock Generation just wanted Easy Listening!

So, the television. Saw several phenomenal hip hop videos and one by Miley Cyrus that made me think about getting an erection, finally figured out who the band Keane was, and settled into a back-and-forth between two fifteen-year-old extravaganzas of the American Gruesome: Red Dragon and 8MM. (I’ll assume, through remote-knuckling rumination, you know what these are by now.) Both, with commercial interruption, had me ambivalent enough to miss chunks of one while watching the other. When I finally settled into watching one of them, here’s the thing: I picked 8MM, though Red Dragon is clearly the better movie.

I had watched A Star is Born, though I had in my hands Butler’s novel (there were intervening factors), of which George Bernard Shaw wrote, “It drives one almost to despair of English literature when one sees so extraordinary a study of English life as (TWoAF) making so little impression that when, some years later, I produce plays in which Butler’s extraordinarily fresh, free, and future-piercing suggestions have an obvious share, I am met with nothing but vague cacklings about Ibsen and Nietzsche… Really, the English do not deserve to have great men.”

You don’t have to just be in a certain mood or state of inebriation to gravitate toward the easier thing. Movies and books are different animals, and it doesn’t take a genius to see that the great body of story-telling in our time and the one closest to the heart of our world culture is done on the screen. Watching this year’s Oscars with half the planet, it occurred to me that it would take a genius sociologist just to parse exactly what we were doing in that room and what it meant to us. It was beyond me. I did observe that for the first time I can remember, nothing that was complete trash won a major award.

Red Dragon – as much of it as I watched – worked in surprise, elaborated by talented actors. 8MM worked in cliché, stereotype and little-altered preexisting forms (though young megastars Joaquin Phoenix, James Gandolfini and Catherine Keener supplied rye, mustard and onions to Nicholas Cage’s leading thick slice of ham). Why then, was it preferable?

I have some thoughts. For one, I watched neither film all the way through, and with frequent commercial interruption. The rewards of slow, unrolling narrative would have been lost were they available. Film is a kind of dreaming – while also a fashion show, a distraction, a moving painting and many other things – and in dreams we exercise the demons we have already. And as my partner points out, I’ll watch anything after a little pulque: SyFy network movies with their bad scripts, found locations and sloppy digital effects, badly dubbed Polish or barely intelligible Spanish TV, public programming about artesanal dollmaking, whatever. There is that bread-and-circus factor, the sleep of the mind we obviously crave.

I’m not justifying the recent universal dominance of big and dumb at the multiplex – those movies are hard work in their own dull fashion -but watching 8MM go through the motions, I can see how this happened. We go to better, one might say more literary films, and on a whole other higher or deeper level to literature itself, for a different thing. Surprise, and a captivation which is active on the reader’s part. We are not there to work something out, but to live in a new territory.


In the interests of producing interesting, conversation-provoking content for this blog, to turn our customers on to books they’d never considered reading before or were long curious about, and inspired by novelist Steve Erickson’s terrifc uncontemporary movie reviews in Los Angeles Magazine – and to tickle the Google and Facebook monsters’ bellies – I’ve decided to do capsule reviews of books we have in stock, pulled out of the air.

So I’ll start from ground zero, the base metal of the nineteenth century English novel; a kid’s book, really, but one that has so fully entered the subconscious of the culture that flotsam from it floats to the surface of advertising, branding, and public speech somewhere on a daily basis. It is this penetration of our contemporary culture that makes everything in Stevenson’s novel fully transparent to today’s reader. I can’t think of a single book that is easier to read. A perfect palate-cleanser for a break between Balzac and Brecht, or just  rough patch when you’re too distracted to concentrate.

Some aspects of this foundational novel:

Long John Silver does have a parrot on his shoulder, but nowhere in the book does any of the pirates say, ‘Oooh-arrr’. It comes clear, perhaps for the first time (it was for this reader) that the now generally accepted “pirate accent” is in this case a Cornish or West Country English accent – the novel’s action begins in Cornwall. Real pirates must have had all kinds of accents, but it is certainly true that the Cornish Diaspora sent a lot of people from that part of the world to sea.

‘Shiver me timbers’ is only said once, in an offhand way by a minor character, and is not by any means a pirate catchphrase.

The ship’s cook is named Barbecue!

The book, published in 1883, takes place in “17__” , a period fantastic-historical novel set approximately a hundred years before its publication.

In popular illustrations drawing on the myth and characters of the novel, usually one sees bright sand and a palm tree or two. But the unidentified island isn’t tropical, and its vague description could place it anywhere from the Azores to Tierra del Fuego.

This is an excellent book for English-learners, easy to follow, with simple vocabulary.

Hardcover, 80 pesos.


First off, we’re having a sale today anyway, and I should emphasize that: 1/3 off all U.S. writers in all categories.

I think it will fill up fast downstairs: they’re carrying stateside coverage of the game (one customer told me in that case he would come, for the commercials) and offering an unbeatable beer-and-slider all you can stuff in deal. We’ll be open until the game starts, and then available in the bar to guide customers upstairs to the books at request.

Why am I watching a football game, on purpose?

I have zero interest in watching sports. Whether this is because my deepest formative years were spent in European hotels before American sports were televised abroad or because of a particular mental or sociological makeup, I can’t say. I’ve just never cared.  The Super Bowl, with it’s weird echoes of that ‘peculiar institution’ that ended officially in 1863, and real violence and air of mass-savagery, kind of skeezes me out in a way no other sport comes close to doing.

So I’m not a fairweather fan like most of those Seattleites all of a sudden calling themselves the ‘twelfth man’ – a phrase I’d never heard until last week – in fact, I have a history with the Seahawks that would understandably make me root for the Broncos or even find a shaman to cast a spell on the team.

Twenty years ago, at the start of my civic activism in Seattle, I was the campaign manager for two citizens’ initiative campaigns, and one electoral campaign against the public funding of Seattle’s new baseball and football stadiums.

And there they stand today.

The powers that be put the baseball stadium to the voters, who said no. Then the state legislature called an emergency session – an emergency session – to fund the project, on King County’s (where Seattle is) dime. We started a citizens’ initiative campaign that was deemed hopeless before even qualifying for the ballot. That was round one.

But we rolled our organization right into the next fight (it was called, very to the point, Citizens for More Important Things) against bigger enemies: the Seahawks. Paul Allen of Microsoft had just bought the team. We gathered 75,000 signatures in just six weeks to stop him from logrolling the County. The whole while, Seahawks fans – those 12ths – called my office daily to threaten to blow it up, burn it down, shoot down signature gatherers. It was a different time, I didn’t take them terribly seriously.

But in a corner of my mind, I did. And the stress of that campaign, the cold, the tyrranical orders of a boss who is really one of the sweetest guys in the world and was one of the co-founders of this store fifteen years later, combined to start the nerve and muscle pain disorder that has tormented me since. (Much, much less since moving here. In fact, it was in large part why I moved here.)

Finally Allen, in a grandiose display of rich-guy cynicism, simply told the state to hold a one-issue ballot election, at his expense, and that would decide it.

Not unconstitutional technically, just massively so spiritually.

The fat little fucker won (surprise!) and it’s seventeen years on and the Seahawks are in the Super Bowl a week after a Seattle rapper without a record label swept the Grammys. (I like the Macklemore record – it’s even brought me to the edge of tears on occasion. I know that as a white rapper he comes with an almost religious respect bordering on apology to the hiphop game.  But having won those four – meaningless – little statues, he’s now out in the wider world where hometown rah-rah won’ t float him at all, and the internet pirahnas are under his flotation device. And that lyric – “and if I fall / then my city, they got me” – I remember when I felt that way, and believed it with my entire heart. That’s an illusion, bro. I wish him well, and good luck. And I recognize that a Seattle whose identity is based on hiphop and football is unrecognizable to me. So it should be, and that puts it well and even further behind me.)

I talked to my good friend Bryan Miller yesterday, something of an entrepreneurial mover and shaker in Seattle these days in a good way: he runs the drinkeycultural Naked City Brewing Company, a brewpub dedicated to movies, literature, and soccer. He tells me that between Macklemore’s success and the Seahawks in the game today, Seattle is posed to get adrenalized on a scale perhaps unseen before. You need that, in February, in Seattle.

But he says, knowing the strange weather-and-substances linked manic depression of the place (pot is legal there now, and taking its place in the culture out of the shadows and unashamed alongside alcohol) that if they lose….


… it’s gonna be a bummer.

The only thing holding me back from wishing destruction 100% on the Seahawks is the passionate dedication to the team (no fairweather fan she) of our co-founder Kim Suther, who will spend today somewhere in Seattle, screaming in a bar. I love her, and she practically built this place with her bare fucking hands, so I don’t want her team to lose.

Either result will provoke feeling. I’ve never gotten that from a sports event. The energy around this for me, and all the damn Seattleites filling up this town – it’s impossible to look away. Or, maybe I’ll get bored after ten minutes and go back upstairs, drink tequila and listen to Hunky Dory.


We’re almost live and nationwide on Canal 22 this Tuesday, November 20th at 9 PM! Watch and tell us what you think of the old decor, and my Spanish – both in less than perfect condition!

New review: 10 out of 10!!!

November 6th, 2013

The new D.F.-based books blog Bookstops just ran a terrific review of the store and rated us a 10 out of 10!


What is hot, what is not

October 30th, 2013

We had our second anniversary of the store here a few nights ago. It was a cold and blustery one (for D.F.) so we weren´t crammed, just twenty or so dedicated regulars and dear friends. We didn´t have a reader scheduled. Since the store moved in over a bar, the onus is removed from us to be a liquor-pouring, beer can-rinsing type host. More catching-up was done, and poring through boxes on the floor (as the wallpaper-peeling, ceiling-painting, stamping and pricing and rug-laying had left me high and dry energy-wise when it came to the stuff that didn´t absolutely have to get done). I owe a big, big thank you to Tom Nissley, Dave Kalil, Brian Pew, Laura Munoz, Phil Wohlstetter, Bill Walters, Kim Suther, Chris Zacker, Mike Eros, Dick Earley and Kevin Odlozil for making this last Texas trip a good haul.

I gave a short and rambling speech, about how our parameters make us a very special kind of store in this Twittery age. We don´t do special orders – that kind of overhead is out of our range -we are getting new stock in almost daily. We don´t take phone calls, because I don´t want to carry around two cellphones, or pay for a land line with money I could spend on books. This is really a place (I emphasized) you have to come to in order to experience. Browsing, and its incumbent promise of surprise, are what we are about.

I also talked a little bit about how my view of the store has changed since starting it. I had originally imagined something like a kind of Expat Readers´Society. The native English-speaking population isn´t just too small to put out a literary magazine. It´s not even big enough to buy a literary magazine if we published one. Literary culture, as it almost always does, exists here in the lap of the solitary reader. I meet this people, one at a time, make recommendations which lead down long corridors of further reading. That is our so-called scene. And furthermore, most – nearly 90 % – of our customer base is native to the city. This store is Mexican, and with few exceptions, for Mexicans. (Not that expats, tourists and passers-through are anything less than welcome.) I wanted to make that clear to any of our Mexican friends who think the place is not wholly and entirely their own. I address my customers in Spanish because we are in Mexico, and while we gather here to read in English, we can just as easily be social in Spanish. (When I get a wide-eyed look of panic, I switch to English. Sometimes people are indigant – ¨Do I look Mexican?¨ Actually, yes. Red-haired or blonde, black or Asian, you do ´look Mexican´- unless you are wearing sandals.  And if you´ve ever assumed and addressed one of those Mexicans in English and gotten a look of resentment for reinforcing the sense of difference they have felt all their lives, you would say ´Bienvenidos!´to everyone who came in the door too.)

The conversation moved to our hardest-to-keep titles: Lolita, Under the Volcano (natch), The Great Gatsby, The Savage Detectives, and recently, due to my over-the-moon endorsement on the interwebs. Middlemarch. The store is a good barometer of the rising and falling stock of writers in English completely removed from the critical centers – though outposted by them as waves of appeal, disdain and rediscovery cross and finish and rise again. Maybe the most surprising – though small – revival of a long-ignored writer I have seen in the store is the craze of the young for the mid-nineteenth century English poet laureate Alfred Lord Tennyson. (Not kidding!) Among poets also the surprising prominence of W.H. Auden, with Eliot, Stevens, Dickinson and Bishop holding steady. (Plus Anne Carson, whose books we can hardly ever get our hands on.)

In fiction, people for some reason continue to be very interested in Paul Auster, who must have a hell of a Spanish translator, because, meh. Jennifer Egan continues to rank very high, while Ann Patchett has slipped from a nearly equal place. People who forgot Philip Roth as he repeated himself throughout the 70s and 80s are knocked out by his last fifteen years of dark, amazing work. On the book run, in the basement of the San Antonio library, David Lida urged the works of Cynthia Ozick on me, and sure enough they are already almost gone. (I´ve never read Cynthia Ozick.) John Le Carre continues to convert non-genre readers like myself. Nobody has asked for Nathaniel West in a long time. Joan Didion is not the white-hot rage she was last year (Blue Nights seems to understandably mark the end of her razor-sharp skills, while her other work remains peerless IMHO.) The worldwide Austen epidemic seems to have cooled, and Henry Miller to have dated terribly. Now if people would just recognize that Kerouac and Bukowski have more style but aren´t a whit better. These Marisha Pessl books frankly look like crap to me. Somebody is even suggesting David Foster Wallace was a scam, but nobody is listening to him. Tom Rachmann´s The Imperfectionists sat untouched since the move on account of its pretentious-looking cover, but it is actually damn good. Virginia Woolf continues to fly off the shelves, totally deservedly. These Gaddis books haven´t moved, but maybe that is just because I priced them so high.

I could go on like this forever. Come see what we have in the store. Bring books for generous credit, and if you want to support us from afar, see our donations list (or our Paypal button!) at www.underthevolcanobooks.com.

Thank you and keep reading.